Sunday, September 24, 2006

Hebrews 1:8 "The Song of the Bridegroom"

προς δε τον υιον ο θρονος σου ο θεος εις τον αιωνα του αιωνος ραβδος ευθυτητος η ραβδος της βασιλειας σου

ηγαπησας δικαιοσυνην και εμισησας ανομιαν δια τουτο εχρισεν σε ο θεος ο θεος σου ελαιον αγαλλιασεως παρα τους μετοχους σου

Heb 1:8,9 But of the son he says, Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever, and the righteous scepter is the scepter of Thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; therefore God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness above Thy companions.

In order to demonstrate the contrast between the angels and Jesus Christ, the author of Hebrews makes use of Psalm 45 quoting these two verses. As they appear here in Hebrews 1:8, these verses refer to the relationship between Father and Son, a relationship so intimate that in these verses, the author makes it understood that the Father calls the Son “God”. The Father assigns the throne of God to the Son. The Son is also confirmed as the anointed Messiah of God, since the Son has “loved righteousness and hated lawlessness”, referring to Christ’s redemptive work.

In these verses, the author of Hebrews makes use of Psalm 45 to testify of Christ’s divinity. Thus, he opens a window through which we see how he interprets scriptures in light of Christ as the divine Word of God.

Psalm 45 is a love song, and according to the rabbis, it was used as a wedding song. In this psalm the song writer exalts the virtues of the groom, the groom’s God, and the he praises the virtues of the bride.

In order to better understand the use of this psalm in Hebrews, let us study the psalm more carefully.

In verse 1, the psalmist expresses his profound feelings of emotion as he writes his verses:

My heart overflows with a pleasing theme; I address my verses to the king; my tongue is like the pen of a ready scribe.

In vs. 2-5 the psalmist exalts the beauty, courage, spirituality, and moral values of the bridegroom.

(2) You are the most handsome of the sons of men; grace is poured upon your lips; therefore God has blessed you forever. (3) Gird your sword on your thigh, O mighty one, in your splendor and majesty! (4) In your majesty ride out victoriously for the cause of truth and meekness and righteousness; let your right hand teach you awesome deeds! (5) Your arrows are sharp in the heart of the king's enemies; the peoples fall under you.

In verse 6, the psalmist shifts to another person. This verse does not refer to the bridegroom, but to the God of the bridegroom. The psalmist praises the moral greatness of the bridegroom’s God. This God is eternal and just.

Your throne, O God, is forever and ever. The scepter of your kingdom is a scepter of uprightness;

In verse 7, the psalmist returns to acclaim the bridegroom because just as his God, the bridegroom loves that which his God loves. Then the psalmist proceeds to describe the marvelous consequences to the bridegroom for loving that which his God loves.

You love righteousness, and hate wickedness; therefore God, Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness above Your fellows.

In verse 8 the psalmist describes the wedding apparel of the bridegroom, and the musical adoration he receives in the palatial surroundings of the wedding.

Your robes are all fragrant with myrrh and aloes and cassia. From ivory palaces stringed instruments make you glad;

Verse 9 is a transition in which the psalmist turns to describe the beauty and virtues of the bride, the queen. However, this section also belongs to the bridegrooom’s praises. The psalmist praises the bridegroom for the beauty of the bride, the queen, decked in “gold of Ophir”, the finest gold.

Daughters of kings are among your ladies of honor; at your right hand stands the queen in gold of Ophir.

The remaining verses, from 10-17, describe the bride’s beauty and render praises to her because as she reigns beside the righteous king, she will be eternally remembered by her people.

(10) Hear, O daughter, and consider, and incline your ear: forget your people and your father's house, (11) and the king will desire your beauty. Since he is your lord, bow to him. (12) The people of Tyre will seek your favor with gifts, the richest of the people. (13) All glorious is the princess in her chamber, with robes interwoven with gold. (14) In many-colored robes she is led to the king, with her virgin companions following behind her. (15) With joy and gladness they are led along as they enter the palace of the king. (16) In place of your fathers shall be your sons; you will make them princes in all the earth. (17) I will cause your name to be remembered in all generations; therefore nations will praise you forever and ever.

Therefore in this psalm there are three major characters: the bridegroom, the God of the bridegroom, and the bride.

However, the author of Hebrews, in Hebrews 1:8,9 unifies the characters of the bridegroom and the God of the bridegroom in One person, the person of Jesus Christ.

(8) But of the Son he says, "Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom. (9) You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions."

Jesus taught that the psalms were about him (Luke 24:44). The author of Hebrews took that seriously. Therefore, when he reads Psalm 45, the author of Hebrews no longer reads a love song. In light of Christ, he can see a glorious reference to the person of Christ, that Jesus is at the same time the bridegroom and the God of the bridegroom to which the psalmist referred.

In unifying these two characters within the person of Jesus Christ, the author of Hebrews infuses Psalm 45 with another dynamic. It is no longer the psalmist’s expression of admiration for the bridegroom and the bridegroom’s God. After the redemptive work of Jesus Christ on the cross, for the author of Hebrews, the Psalm has now become a song of worship and praise between God the Father and God’s Son Jesus Christ.

The bridegroom is now Jesus Christ, whose God is not only the eternal God, but the God that also recognizes the bridegroom also as God, anointed by the same God to reign eternally because he loved righteousness and abhorred wickedness as a human being. And although it is not the expressed intent of the author of Hebrews, the bride of Psalm 45 by reference is the church, the wife of the bridegroom, the wife of God! What a great privilege for believers, to be spiritually married to the great eternal God Jesus Christ, who is Himself acclaimed as eternal God by God the Father.

No wonder the author of Hebrews exalts Jesus Christ above all other beings who serve God, since Jesus is God in Himself serving God and all creation.

Hebrews 1:7 "The Great Contrast"

και προς μεν τους αγγελους λεγει ο ποιων τους αγγελους αυτου πνευματα και τους λειτουργους αυτου πυρος φλογα

But about the angels he says, “the one who makes his angels spirits, and his ministers flame of fire”.

The “but” in the original Greek is intensive. This “but” is a very particular term which in the Greek is used to highlight the contrast between what has been said and that which follows.

The author documents his conviction on the scriptures, quoting Psalm 104:4. This psalm exalts the greatness of God. God’s greatness is partly revealed in his angels. These beings are God’s breath, they are described as scattering the winds which emerge from God. They spread about God’s breath, and propagate it like fire. If this description of angels is taken literally, that they are like “spirits, wind, breath, fire”, these metaphors point to their ability to materialize in various forms as a means of manifesting God’s involvement all over creation. However their own existence is outside any level of existence known to humanity. Notwithstanding their function as supernatural representatives of the Deity, as messengers from God, these beings cannot even be compared to Jesus Christ. This is the reason why the grammatical particle “men” (but) is used, to highlight the contrast.

These beings worship Jesus Christ. It is not Jesus Christ who renders service to these beings.

Friday, September 22, 2006

Hebrews 1:6 "The Song of the Bridegroom in Hebrews 1"

Hebrews 1:6

οταν δε παλιν εισαγαγη τον πρωτοτοκον εις την οικουμενην λεγει και προσκυνησατωσαν αυτω παντες αγγελοι θεου

Consider anew that when he introduces the firstborn to the world’s inhabitants he says “Bow down before him all the angels of God”.

Some have thought that this and other references to Jesus as God’s “firstborn” is evidence that Jesus is not eternally divine but was created and designated a divine being by God. The argument is that Jesus was conceived and created as a human being through God’s power. Thus, Jesus is called the “firstborn” of God. However, the use of the term “firstborn” goes to sustain the contrary.

When God introduces or presents the Son to the world’s inhabitants, God emphasizes the Son’s divinity by introducing him not only as Son but as Firstborn. God does not want for there to be any question about Jesus’ lineage as nothing but divine. Not only is Jesus Son, but Firstborn. The emphasis is on the same substance and essence relationship between Father and Son.

The second emphasis is on the order that God gives to the angels when He presents Jesus, His Firstborn. “Bow down before him all the angels of God”. God would not order the worship of a created being by other created beings. God would only command the worship of God.[1] To do otherwise would go against God’s nature.[2] It is precisely because of Jesus’ divine nature that the angels are commanded to worship Him, even in His incarnate human form of an infant.

The author of Hebrews takes the prophetic words of Psalm 97:7, “Bow down before him all the angels of God”, and applies them to the incarnation of Jesus Christ. When an angel announced to the shepherds the birth of the Messiah, Luke records that “suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men” (Luke 2:13,14). These words of praise are not to be misunderstood. The praises and glory to God include both God in the highest and to the incarnate God on earth bringing peace and good will toward all.

Those angels were sent to worship Jesus of Nazareth, per command of God the Father. The command to worship the infant son is to render the most profound and reverent adoration. The verb “to worship” as used in that time described the oriental custom of kneeling and then bowing until the forehead touched the ground in profound worship and most sacred reverence. The command of the supreme Deity given to the angelic host and recorded in Psalm 97:7, was fulfilled when the infant Jesus, in the poverty of the manger, received the reverent, profound, and tender adoration of the entire angelic host in the heavens. They were worshipping God made flesh. Such was, is, and shall be the exalted greatness of Jesus of Nazareth, Son of God, and Son of man!
[1] “You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve” (Matthew 4:10 NKJV).
[2] Exodus 20:3-6.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Epistle to the Hebrews: "The Song of the Bridegroom", 1:5

τινι γαρ ειπεν ποτε των αγγελων υιος μου ει συ εγω σημερον γεγεννηκα σε και παλιν εγω εσομαι αυτω εις πατερα και αυτος εσται μοι εις υιον

For, to which angel in particular, at any moment in the past, did he say “You are my son, I have begotten you?” Moreover, “I will be to him as father and he shall be to me as son”?

The angels, as a group of angelic beings, receive the name of “sons of the Almighty” (Psalm 29:1). It is a precious name that designates them within a very special group before God as God’s sons. But the argument that our author presents to the readers is that no one angel in particular, ever, has been designated by God as “His Son”. God’s relationship with Jesus of Nazareth is such that God acclaims Him as His Son. Moreover, the pronoun “I” which refers to God, is the pronoun used in the Greek when the importance of the person is emphasized. It is the divine “I”, the holy and infinite almighty God, eternal and divine in nature, who acclaims Jesus as His son.

In the Old Testament Hebrew culture, “sons” could be grandchildren, great grandchildren, and even more distant generations. The logic behind the designation of “sons” for any offspring removed by one or more generations is because those descendants retained the blood lineage, the same substance, of their progenitor. A son was a son if he was of the same blood line of his progenitor. A son’s first claim was by virtue of the blood line, what they called “the seed” of the progenitor. The blood line was the link to his ancestor.

Sonship was not merely determined because the ancestor was his actual biological father. As long as the offspring had his blood line, he was the son of the progenitor. For this reason the kings of Israel who were descendants of David were called “sons of David”.

This entire phrase, “You are my son, I have begotten you today” is a direct quote from Psalm 2:7. This is a psalm that announces the coming of the Messiah (a Messianic psalm). Therefore, the one who God is claiming as “my son” is the person of Jesus Christ. The meaning of the phrase is that God declares that even in his incarnation, Jesus of Nazareth is still “my son”, or of the same substance and nature of the Deity. That father-son relationship pointed to not only the spiritual union between Jesus and the Deity, but that Jesus was signaled as belonging to the divine nature, of the same essence and substance as the eternal Deity. As a true father, God the Father recognizes and acclaims his Son as his, because although Christ empties himself of his place within the Deity, he retains his divine essence and substance of pure and eternal love.[1]


[1] Philippians 2:7

Epistle to the Hebrews: "The Song of the Bridegroom", 1:4

τοσουτω κρειττων γενομενος των αγγελων οσω διαφορωτερον παρ αυτους κεκληρονομηκεν ονομα

Much more abundantly he has become than the angels because he is the rightful heir of an even more excellent name in comparison [to the angels]

The first word of this sentence in the Greek is “much more in abundance”. It needs to be remembered that in the Greek the first word of the sentence is the one that has the emphasis in the meaning of the sentence. The author chooses his first word to underline the theme of the greatness of Christ.

The author emphasizes the divinity of Christ from two perspectives. One, is his divinity before his incarnation. This is the divinity of Christ described by the author in verses one and two. Now, in verses three and four the author explains the divinity of Christ after his incarnation. As a result of having purified our sins in his own body, his divinity is now magnified and exalted. Not only as God before his incarnation but now as a human being purifying our sins in his own body. Now, having become flesh he is re-established above any other created being to his supreme and exalted divinity. Not only is he a divine being, as the angels, but although he existed in human form he is now exalted greatly above any other created being. The author does not wish the believers to think that due to his incarnation, Christ suffered a loss in his divinity. Rather, due to his work of purifying our sins in his human body, Christ has been re-established and exalted to his full divinity because of his name. His exalted name of Son. When compared to the angels, although a human being, Christ is re-established to a full divinity because he is heir to a more excellent name, Son of God. There is no other being who carries that name, Son of God.
When compared to the name of angel, the name of Christ Son of God is more excellent. For the author it is important to make this comparison. For the ancient Hebrews, angelic beings were divine beings surrounding the throne of God. Angels represented the divinity before creation. They did not belong to the human creation. Our author does not wish for Christ to be confused even with that rank of heavenly beings who represent the presence of God on earth. Jesus Christ has a more excellent name. His name is more excellent than the outstanding name of angel, or divine representative or messenger. The author now goes on to point out, based on the scriptures, the meaning of that more excellent name of Jesus Christ.

Epistle to the Hebrews: "The Song of the Bridegroom", 1:3

ος ων απαυγασμα της δοξης και χαρακτηρ της υποστασεως αυτου φερων τε τα παντα τω ρηματι της δυναμεως αυτου δι εαυτου καθαρισμον ποιησαμενος των αμαρτιων ημων εκαθισεν εν δεξια της μεγαλωσυνης εν υψηλοις

He is the radiant glory and the precise representation of his being, who sustains all that is by the word of his power; after he within himself purified our sins he sat at the right hand of the majesty in the exalted heights.

Jesus is the glory of God. All the glory, majesty, and splendor that we may ever be able to understand belongs to God, is owed to the person of Jesus. Jesus is the very splendor that gives God the glory ascribed to his divine being. Without Jesus, the Deity would not have any glory. Jesus is the inherent glory and majesty and eternity of God.

The author does not mince words to describe the divine nature of Jesus. Jesus is of the same essence, the same divine substance of God. Therefore he is the exact and faithful representation of God. Therefore, all the inherent power of Jesus emanates from his word with which he sustains all that exists. All that time and space encompass with their infinite galaxies, suns and worlds is sustained throughout the infiniteness of eternity by his word that springs from his divine power.

The power is not in his word. His word is powerful because Jesus is the glory of God and the power of God. His word springs from his infinite and majestic glory.

In that being of infinite majesty, glory and power, were purified all the sins of humanity. But that purification was not purged in his glorified body but in his human body. In his body crushed by our pain and shamefulness were purified all the sins of humanity. Infinite glory resolved to bring an end to the problem of human shame. Jesus in his own body took all the guilt, rebellion, pride, envy, malice and murderous bent of humanity. Mysteriously he integrated all evil into his own body of love. His love purified all the sin of humanity in his own body. This is great good news for all sinners. Our sins were purged, purified, forgiven, absolved, quashed, eradicated in a body other than our own, and before we even came into being. We were forgiven in his body. Everything was purified in his body, and not in our own. In our own body we suffer sin and all its consequences. But in the body of Jesus of Nazareth we were forgiven because in his body were purified our sins once and for all! May the name of our Lord be praised and glorified!

The radical certainty that our sins were purified in his body is repeated with other metaphors and symbols in Hebrews 3 and 4. There the author employs the theme of resting by faith in Christ to highlight the finished work of Christ on our behalf.

Due to his work of presenting his body for the purification of the sins of humanity, and the full consummation of that work on our behalf, he sat down at the right hand of the majesty of God in the exalted heavenly heights. The glory of God was overlaid with the work of Christ consummating the forgiveness of our sins through his shed blood on the cross. Our sins were purified with his blood and in his body. His great work of giving his life as a sacrifice for us adorns the glory of God and grants him the right to sit at the right hand of the majesty of God in the most exalted heavenly places.

Epistle to the Hebrews: "The Son of the Bridegeroom", v.2

Hebrews 1:2

επ εσχατου των ημερων τουτων ελαλησεν ημιν εν υιω ον εθηκεν κληρονομον παντων δι ου και τους αιωνας εποιησεν

Having come to these final days he has spoken to us in [the] Son, who has been designated the heir of all things, through whom he also made the aeons;

The idea expressed by the grammatical structure of this sentence is that “the end time has come upon us in these days”. The word the author uses is the “eschaton”. This adjective describes something at the extreme point of something, regardless if it is time or space. As far as time, it is the final point of human history. The “eschaton” is the very last, when all is about to end. It is at this specific time when God manifests himself in all his fullness, and in all clarity. The author wants to make it clear that we are no longer living in antiquity, nor in times past. We are now living at the extreme end of time. That which was useful for those in antiquity is no longer useful for those of us who are living at the extreme end of time. A full and special revelation is necessary.

This full revelation of God’s presence has been manifested “in Son”. Here the author does not use the definite article “the” to introduce the “Son”. The article was omitted in the Greek when one wanted to call attention to the subject’s singular or special identity. The author highlights the uniqueness of Christ as the One who in the flesh reveals God’s word to humanity. The word of God has now been poured out in its fullness upon the Son, so that he who has seen the Son, has seen the Father (John 1:18; John 14:9). In contrast to the “prophets” who in antiquity had received God’s revelation in bits and pieces, the Son is God made manifest.

The Son has been designated the owner, the title holder, of all things. The emphasis is not that he is the heir, but that all things are his, belong to him, and have been given to him by divine decree. Therefore, he receives all things since he is the heir by divine decree.

The Son was God’s instrument at the creation of the universe (John 1:1-3). Now he is no longer instrumental but owner of all creation. The word the author uses here for creation does not describe the creation of matter or space, but uniquely the creation of time. The word is “aeons”. He created the aeons of time and all which these contain, including all time and space, all matter that would ever occupy the space of time. He is not only the creator of the aeons. He also possesses by divine decree all time integrated therein for all aeons to come. All eternity is his. All time has also been consigned to him. To his nail pierced hands has been delivered all time past, present, and future. He now fills the past with his presence and therefore all human history acquires the meaning given to it by his presence. What in the past was fragmented, he now unifies and fills to its fullness. He is not one more link in the past’s fragmented revelation. He now becomes in Himself the past of all humanity. All that was given to humanity in the past is now to be understood in his fullness, and is invested with his fullness. On behalf of humanity, he now represents the entire past of humanity before the eternity of God. Jesus Christ is the Lamb of God slain from before the creation of the world (Revelation 13:8).

Jesus Christ is not only the collective past of all humanity. He is also the past of every single individual before God. His past is now my past. All that he was before his incarnation is now also my past. All that he is now before God is also my ongoing present. All that he will be forever before God will be my future forever. Jesus is the Lord of time, and all that he is gives value and meaning to time. This aspect of Christ as the meaning of time in all its diverse forms and symbols will be developed more fully in Hebrews 3 and 4.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Ths Song of the Bridegroom in Hebrews - Chapter 1

Introduction.

The first chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews is not only the introduction to the entire epistle. It is an exalted song of worship and praise to Jesus of Nazareth, Son of God, Son of man. He is exalted as “Christ and Lord”. The great surprise of the first chapter in this epistle is that it contains a love song to Jesus Christ, as the bridegroom of humanity, and Son of God. These acclamations are given to emphatically affirm Christ’s divinity and thus superior in every way to any angel. What God says of Christ has never been said of any angel. Although clearly these affirmations are the author’s own declaration of faith, he bases his faith on Scriptures, particularly the psalms. The author however, quotes the psalms within the context of Christ’s exaltation by God the Father at his right hand.[1]

Heb 1:1 πολυμερως και πολυτροπως παλαι ο θεος λαλησας τοις πατρασιν εν τοις προφηταις

Heb. 1:1 Many times and in many ways since ancient times God has spoken to the fathers through the prophets

The author begins by affirming God’s revelation to the Jews as real and truthful. The history of Israel is the history of God’s revelation of his will and intent towards them.

In the New Testament Greek, the original language of this epistle, the first words of the sentence are the one that carry the emphasis. The words that the writer wishes the reader to consider most carefully are placed at the beginning of the sentence.

The author begins his Epistle to the Hebrews employing two powerful words. These are “Polumeros” and “Polutropos”. The author uses them as a pair, and the pair has a similar sound, helping the author with the emphasis he wishes to give.

“Polumeros” is a compound word. It comes from “polus” which means “many”, and from “meros” which means “parts”. The other word is “polutropos”, also a compound word. It comes from “polus” (many), and from “tropos” which means “ways, manners, forms”.

The emphasis the author wishes to create is on the fragmented nature of divine revelation before Christ. It is as if the author were saying “In many tiny pieces and in many different shapes and forms in ancient times God spoke to our fathers through the prophets”. These tiny pieces were fragments of time. Sometimes he would speak through a prophet, then there was a fragment of time with no divine revelation. Then God would communicate with another prophet for another fragment of time. With each prophet the revelation was given in a slightly different manner, since it took on the form and identity of each particular prophet.

Without minimizing the fact that God had spoken through the prophets, the author simply calls attention to the fragmented quality of the divine revelation. It was an interrupted communication with a variety of receptors.

The author also notes that this fragmented and multiform communication was in times past (ancient times), and to the fathers of Israel.

In contrast to the antiquity of this revelation, the author now proceeds to call attention to what God is doing now. This nothing more nor less than “the eschaton”, “the final days” of the present created order. For the author, he counted his days among the “last days”, “the time of the end”.









[1] In this study the Greek text is quoted first, then followed by the author’s own translation in italics, unless otherwise noted.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Bashar! Bashar! The Good News of the King's Victory!

In the ancient Middle East, a king would occasionally travel away from his city.[1] His travels might be to strike an alliance or to secure the trade of some needed goods. He would leave his people in the relative safety of his city fortified by its massive walls.[2]

Inside his people would go on with their ordinary tasks: the preparation of food, the practice of their trades, the care of their children. They knew their king would return. Meanwhile their city was well fortified and supplied with all the necessary water and provisions to last throughout the absence of their king.

However, it was not unusual for an enemy, a king from a neighboring city, to take advantage of the king’s absence and lay siege to the city without its king and army.

There was no greater threat to the inhabitants within the wall. The invading king and his army would cut off all water supplies. No one could go out to bring in fresh produce from the surrounding lands. These were now in the hands of the invaders. No messengers would dare leave the city to inform the absent king. The population was doomed to the disgrace of surrender or invasion. In either case, the women would be raped, all survivors would be taken as slaves, the city looted, and set on fire. Upon his return the king would find his people gone, and his city in ruins.

During the first few weeks of the siege, the population survived on the rations of water and food stored within the city. The sentries and the few soldiers left behind would try to fend off attacks from the invaders attempting to scale the walls or breach the wall with their battering rams.[3] Their only hope was the return of the king. But if the king delayed, and no message of the city’s plight could be delivered, the inhabitants faced certain death through starvation or invasion. The survivors faced slavery and exile.[4]

As the weeks passed, rations would run out. The inhabitants would begin killing off their starving beasts of burden for food.[5] Then they would chew on the leather on their sandals. When these were gone, the survivors would turn against their own infants for food.[6] They were hopeless and helpless. In their weakened condition they could not fight against the invaders besieging their city. Neither could they attempt to escape. They faced certain doom. Their only hope for salvation was the return of their king.

Then abruptly the besieging army would leave. The sentries on the wall would give notice of their sudden departure. This could only mean one thing: the return of the king. The besieging army was going out to meet him in battle and prevent him from rescuing his city. As the sentries scanned the horizon they would indeed see the dust rising from the battle. Hours would pass, sometimes days as the two armies would maneuver for battle, attack and counterattack. Still, no one in the city would dare escape nor could they. Most were sickly and dying. On the walls the sentries strained their eyes for some sign that would tell them if their king was defeating the invaders or if the besiegers would soon return to take their city uncontested.

Then suddenly, the dust of the distant battle field would begin to settle, until no din of battle sound was heard nor dust from the clashing armies could be seen. A disquieting calm would settle over the desert.

The sentries on the wall looked for some sign, some news that would let them know what the future held for their suffering and dying people.

“Do you see what I see on the hill to the left?” Perhaps one sentry would ask another. “Yes, it seems like there’s something there...” another would answer. Straining their eyes in the falling twilight they could see what looked like little bursts of dust rising from the path on the distant hills. “Yes, yes, I see it, it is dust... could it be he?” The dust would reappear closer on the path... “Yes, yes, it is... he’s coming this way...”

Then the sentries thought they could hear a shout... “Could it be?” Now their concentration was fully fixed. Ears and eyes alert to the slightest sound and movement. There was that far off sound... indeed it sounded like a shout... but they needed to be sure before they could react... They must be sure... if it was... it was too good to be true... Yes, yes, it was. They looked at each other for confirmation... a smile beginning to break on their haggard faces... They could now understand the distant runner’s shout though faint and far... “Bashaaaar! Bashaaaaar! Bashaaaaar!”[7]

Although in disbelief, looking at each other they nodded. Yes, it was “Bashar!” The words echoed now from the surrounding hills. Edging toward the inside of the city wall the sentries gathered their strength to repeat the shout to those dying within: “Bashar!” “Bashar!” “Bashar!”

“Bashar” meant many things all at once. Foremost it was “Great Good News!” Thus it also meant, “The King is Victor”, “Salvation!”, “The King is Savior”. It could also stand for the name of the King. At times even the messenger was called “Bashar”. “Bashar” was unmistakably “Good News”. It did not require explanation. Upon hearing the cry from the sentinels on the wall the people inside found themselves as if reborn. The cry itself was like new life to their dying senses. Whereas one moment they were doomed, upon the hearing of “Bashar” they knew they were saved. One moment they were condemned to certain death. The cry of “Bashar” meant they would live. In the proclamation of one word there was an instant passing from death to life.[8] That new life came entirely from without. Their new life was entirely the gift of another. It was granted to them through no participation, struggle, or effort on their part. It was entirely the king’s doing that brought “Bashar” and its new life to those dying inside the city.[9]

At first it seemed unbelievable. Great good news is always like that. It seems too good to be true. But upon hearing the cry from the sentinels the people inside the city first looked at each other in disbelief. Then slowly one would begin repeating it to another. “Bashar”, “Bashar”,“Bashar”. And slowly the realization of salvation would penetrate through their dying senses. “Bashar?” One would ask for confirmation. “Bashar” another would answer. “Bashar”, the questioner would then repeat in acceptance. They would then hug in the joy of the good news. Then small groups would come together in joyful hugs. Their energies began to return as tears now of joy covered their faces. Slowly the cry from within the city began to be heard echoing the cry from the sentinels on the wall until one joyful chorus erupted from within: “BASHAR!”, “BASHAR!”, “BASHAR!”, “BASHAR!”.

A small door on the gate was opened to let the messenger in. Everyone flocked him to hear first hand the good news. A myriad questions all at once were put to him: How was the battle? How many soldiers died? When are they coming? Was the enemy totally defeated? But the messenger had only one answer: “The King is mighty!” “The King is mighty!” “The King is mighty!”.

Soon the victorious king and his army, with all their booty would come to the city. Psalm 24:7-10 records the entrance of the king into his city, and the adoration with which he was received. The triumphal entry described here is a processional in which an adoring crowd surrounds the king and acclaims him with choruses proclaiming him conqueror and mighty king.

Lift up your heads, O gates! And be lifted up, O ancient doors! That the King of glory may come in. Who is the King of glory? The Lord, strong and mighty, the Lord, mighty in battle! Lift up your heads, O gates! And be lifted up, O ancient doors! That the King of glory may come in. Who is this King of glory? The Lord of hosts, he is the King of glory! [RSV].

As they approached, the king’s entourage would shout to the sentinels on the wall “Lift up the gates that the king of the bounty may come in!” The soldiers on the wall would respond, “Who is the king of the bounty?” The king’s entourage would respond “Our king mighty in battle, he is the king of the bounty!” The gates would open, the king would come in amidst the rapturous adoration of his people. The booty would be distributed to his starving people, and a long, long feast lasting for days would begin.[10] “Bashar” was most certainly “great news of glad tidings”.

However, these words of victory manifest a triumph of much greater magnitude. The battle won by the king celebrated by these shouts of victory is of transcendental and eternal consequences for all. Psalm 24 describes a victory parade in three stanzas. The words of victory quoted above form the last of the stanzas. The first is a description of the territory successfully defended by the king and the king’s original right to govern over all its inhabitants and territory.

The earth is for the Lord, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; for he founded it upon the seas and established it upon the waters.[11]

Through God’s creative acts, the earth is God’s city. Therefore, everything in it, including all the planet’s inhabitants, exist for the sake of the King. Since they exist for his sake, he lives for their safety, protection, prosperity, and perpetuity. He will risk his life to protect and nurture his people, and to save them from all evil.

The second stanza shocks the listener with the true nature of the Hero’s battle and conquest. Apparently the right to dwell in God’s earth and before God’s presence has been lost. There was a moral defeat. No one can now live before the presence of God on the earth unless that person can provide an entire life cycle of moral purity and perfection, of relationships characterized by nothing else than love and justice.[12] All who have struggled in the battle to regain that moral perfection have fought and lost... that is until this heroic king went out to battle on behalf of the lost and condemned due to their moral failure. But now they surround their victorious hero with acclamations of victory. In this great victory parade part of the choristers pose the question:

Who shall ascend the hill of the Lord? And who shall stand in his holy place?

Other choristers respond as they surround their victorious hero and uphold him on their shoulders:

He who has clean hands a pure heart, who does not lift up his soul to what is false, and does not swear deceitfully. He will receive blessing from the Lord, and vindication from the God of his salvation.

These words describe the moral qualities of the hero. They are not a reference to themselves or requirements they must meet. The entourage is a group of “fans” describing the mettle and character of their hero. The other fans in the choir then join them together in joyful acclamation:

Such is the generation [lifetime] of the one who seeks him,[13]

who seeks the face of the God of Jacob [NIV].[14]

Those who praise the king praise him for his amazing moral fortitude. Throughout his life span his life consistently expressed love, joy, honesty, integrity, both in deed and in thought. That moral hero was not only true to others, but also entirely true to himself... consistently, always loving towards self and others. Quite a victory. Worthy of the praise he now receives.

No wonder now the gates open before him... and those who enter with him enter not because of their own moral virtue but solely because they acclaim and adore him as their hero! His victory is bashar for them!

Due to his moral courage he can boldly ascend into the presence of the Eternal One and boldly stand before the Eternal’s presence. He brings before the Eternal one a life that passes the most searching scrutiny at the hands of the Eternal One. This hero has struggled with the fiercest temptations to live entirely for himself, climb all the ladders of power and control, yet always and decidedly chosen to walk the life of lifting others. This One has successfully fought off all the tempestuous waves of the darkness within and without, consistently throughout his life span. This One has consistently and creatively overcome evil with good. He can now approach the One who knows all and with clear conscience say, “Here am I with my perfect deeds, thoughts, and aspirations. Extend your welcome to me, for I meet the requirements to live eternally before Your presence.”

This One has passed the most carefully scrutiny and investigation to find at least one with “clean hands and a pure heart”, one who has never yearned for escapes and false methods of dealing with reality. One whose deeds from birth to death have only expressed acts of disinterested, unprejudiced love. One whose thoughts have always expressed the purest desires and passions towards self and others. A tall order indeed. But this One came forward with his life. This One has clean hands, a pure heart. He never lifted up his soul to what was false, and never swore deceitfully. This One has received blessing from the Lord. This One has been vindicated by God as just, righteous, entirely loving. He has indeed ascended the hill of the Lord, and now stands in God’s holy place. He has been declared victorious and triumphant over all the powers of darkness, falsehood, and evil. The gates have been indeed been lifted so that this triumphant One may come in.

Yet he does not come in alone. He is crowded by a multitude that acclaims his triumphs, his qualities, his love, his integrity, his truthfulness. On what basis do they enter? On the basis of their own victory and success? If it were so, their acclamations would include themselves: “those [we] who have cleans hand and those [we] who have a pure hearts.” Nothing like that here. It is all his worth, his victory, his triumph.

In fact, the psalmist cannot but express his total moral insufficiency when compared to this moral hero. Seeing his own destitute nature, the psalmist cries out to the God of Jacob.

Such is the lifetime of the one who seeks your face, O God of Jacob (Psalm 24:6).

Why Jacob? Why not cry out to the God of Israel? Jacob and Israel were two names given to the same man. However, Jacob was renamed Israel for his moral quality of fighting for God’s blessing until prevailing. Why does not the psalmist appeal to the God of Israel, the wrestler, the fighter? Why does the psalmist rather appeal to the God of Jacob?

Jacob was the younger of Isaac’s twins, Esau and Jacob. He was named Jacob because upon his birth his hand was grasping tightly Esau’s heel. This action of the infant was interpreted by his father as an attempt to supplant or overthrow his older brother. Thus the name Jacob which means “supplanter”. Throught his younger life Jacob was known for his duplicity and complictiy. He was an accomplice with his mother to deceive Isaac in granting him the oldest son’s blessing. Later, he was involved in deceitful dealings with Laban. Jacob was a deceiver. In contrast to the moral hero lauded in this psalm, Jacob was one who “did lift up his soul to what was false, and who did swear deceitfully.” The psalmist sensing his immense moral insufficiency when describing his moral hero, identifies with Jacob the deceiver rather than with Israel who struggled until he obtained the victory. In a prayer for mercy, and as if in contrition beating upon his breast, he appeals to “the God of Jacob” for mercy.[15]

But the King comes as the “King of glory”. In Hebrew the word “glory” is a synonym for the word “weighty possession”. The glory refers to the booty brought by the king as representative of his victory. The greater the loot, the greater the victory. The booty of this king is his moral worth, the value of his life. He freely and graciously invests his entourage with His victory and they enter in on the basis of his triumph... not theirs... all of them were as good as dead and dying before the cry of bashar was given due to his victory. Good news indeed... They bask in the bashar of his victory and triumph as they surround him with joyful acclamations of praise and adulation!

The earth is indeed for the Lord, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; for he has founded it upon the infinitely vast seas of the hero’s moral worth and established it upon the waters of his mercy. Bashar! Bashar! Bashar!

Good News: The King Suffers for His People

A direct reference to the announcement of bashar on the basis of the Hero’s struggle and victory is found in the writings of Isaiah, chapters 53 and 54.

How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of the messenger who announces peace, who brings good news [basahr], who announces salvation, who says to Zion, “Your God reigns.” Listen! Your sentinels lift up their voices, together they sing for joy; for in plain sight they see the return of the Lord to Zion. Break forth together into singing, you ruins of Jerusalem. The Lord has bared his holy arm before the eyes of all the nations; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God (Isaiah 52:7-10 NRSV).

The announcement of bashar is because there is a Hero who has “bared his holy arm” on behalf of his condemned people and given them salvation.

Whereas Psalm 24 describes the moral qualities of the Hero that gave him the victory, Isaiah 52 and 53 describes the price of suffering this Hero had to pay for his moral victory. It was no easy battle. It was not a conventional struggle, and he was not your typical Hero. Rather than the stereotypical fighter with superb physically attractive qualities, this Hero showed up to battle as a David before Goliath. He seemed to have nothing going for him.

Many were astonished at him - his appearance was so marred, beyond human semblance, and his form beyond that of the sons of men (Isaiah 52:14 RSV)... he grew up before him like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him (53:2 NRSV). He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief (53:3 RSV); and as one from whom others hide their faces he was despised, and we held him of no account (53:3 RSV).

The meaning of this description which portrays him as a nobody with nothing going for him is to emphasize his aloneness in his struggle. In looking like an outcast, he had no social support, no group of peers to cheer him on, no fans on the sidelines. He trod the “wine press alone, and from the peoples no one was with me” (Isaiah 63:3 RSV). Rather than a king with the support of a mighty army, he fought this battle on his own. In fact not only alone, but jeered, booed, and rejected by those he was trying to save. A few fans are enough to encourage the underdog. But this one had none in the greatest struggle ever fought, with the most at risk of any struggle: the salvation of his people. “We held him of no account.”[16]

Yet the struggle he endured alone was not for his sake, it was for his people. It was a vicarious or substitutionary struggle. He endured the cruelest pain and punishment on behalf of his people. Those he was fighting for deserved nothing more than the death sentence for their repeated moral failures. Yet he took that punishment upon himself while those whose pain he was taking upon himself were booing him for his attempts.

Surely he has borne our griefs (RSV) and carried our diseases (NRSV); yet we accounted him stricken, struck down by God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the punishment that made us whole, and by his bruises we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have all turned to our own way, and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all (Isaiah 53:4-6 NRSV).

What a struggle! Such commitment! Such love! Innocence and virtue taking on the pain and punishment of guilt and perversion. Yet all along maintaining “clean hands and a pure heart” towards God, those who were inflicting his torment, and those whose pain he was taking upon himself.

He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth... they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth (53:7,9 RSV).

Notice the striking similarity between the descriptive phrase “although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth” with the phrase “he who has clean hands and a pure heart... and does not swear deceitfully” of Psalm 24:4. Both passages (Isaiah 53 and Psalm 24) are describing the same person, the same heroic figure.

The moral victory and suffering of this figure is counted as a sacrifice or an offering for the moral failures of his people. Both his moral uprightness and his suffering are substitutional or in place of his people.

You [the Eternal One] make his life an offering for sin... The righteous one, my servant, shall make many righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities... he poured out himself to death, and was numbered with the transgressors, yet he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors (53:10-12 NRSV).

By providing this substitute for Israel, the Eternal One has become as a divine husband to Israel.

For your Maker is your husband, the Lord of hosts is his name; the Holy One of Israel is your Redeemer, the God of the whole earth he is called (Isaiah 54:5 NRSV).

God’s provision of this Substitute is indeed Good News for the inhabitants of the earth, it is the great shout of Bashar for all. In fact, it is incredible news. No wonder Isaiah 53 begins with the words, “Who has believed what we have heard?” (53:1). The next phrase, although in question form, gives the answer for such unbelievable good news, “And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?” The arm of the Lord has been revealed to this substitutionary heroic figure, whose physical attributes did not quite meet the hero’s standards. Yet, it was in the hero’s weakness and disadvantages that his victory was even more astounding and incredible.

For he grew up before him like a young plant, and like a root out of dry gound; he had no form or majesty that we should look at him. He was despised and rejected by others; a man of suffering and acquainted with infirmity; and as one from whom others hide their faces he was despised, and we held him of no account (Isaiah 53:2,3 NRSV).

Lift up your heads, O gates! And be lifted up, O ancient doors! That the King of glory may come in. Who is the King of glory? The Lord, strong and mighty, the Lord, mighty in battle! Lift up your heads, O gates! And be lifted up, O ancient doors! That the King of glory may come in. Who is this King of glory? The Lord of hosts, he is the King of glory! [Psalm 24:7-10 RSV].

Such is the story of the Old Testament record. God looks for a morally upright human creation and cannot find it.[17] They have all been besieged by an enemy who has broken them down morally and find themselves morally destitute. In their desperation they are at war with each other and cannot find a way out of their condemnation. But the Eternal One and their Creator provides a substitutionary figure who against all odds is able to provide such moral fortitude. And with his triumph, all the inhabitants of the earth are also victorious over death and eternal condemnation. Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the mansions prepared for you before the foundation of the world.
Bashar! Bashar! Bashar!

[1].The following is a study in preparation of the meaning of the word “bashar” in the Old Testament as a foundation for understanding the New Testament term “gospel” or “good news”. Copyright Haroldo S. Camacho, January 10, 2001, Los Angeles, California.
[2].The following description is based on various Old Testament references.
[3].2 Samuel 20:15 describes a siege of a city attempting its invasion with a mound rampart and battering ram.
[4].1 Kings 20:1-6 records the threats of rape and captivity made by the invading king.
[5].2 Kings 6:25 records the high prices that were paid for the body parts of the beasts of burden during a siege.
[6].Deuteronomy 28:52-57 describes all too vividly the atrocities committed and suffered during a siege of a city.
[7].For a descriptive account of the sending of the messenger, the watchmen looking for signs of the runners, and the receiving of the news of “bashar”, see 2 Samuel 18:19-33. This account however, is most moving since what the runner thinks is good news for the king in fact breaks the heart of the king.
[8].See the story of the four lepers during the siege of Samaria who could not keep the good news of “Bashar” for themselves seeing it meant life for their city (2 Kings 7:9).
[9].Isaiah 52:7-10 records the joy of the watchmen on the wall as they hear the messenger’s shout of “Bashar”. Moreover, in these texts, the prophet sees Israel’s God as the King who returns to his city. “How beautiful on the mountains are the feet of those who bring good news [bashar], who proclaim peace, who bring good tidings [bashar], who proclaim salvation, who says to Zion, ‘Your God reigns.’ Listen! Your watchmen lift up their voices; together they shout for joy. When the Lord returns to Zion, they will see it with their own eyes. Burst into songs of joy together, you ruins of Jerusalem, for the Lord has comforted his people, he has redeemed Jerusalem [NIV]. The Lord has bared his holy arm before the eyes of all the nations; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God [RSV].”
[10].2 Kings 7:1,16 records the distribution of the bounty taken from an invading army.
[11].Notwithstanding the many translations to the contrary, the Hebrew denotes the dative and not the genitive (“The earth is for the Lord” rather than “of the Lord”). The sense of the dative for concurs with the overall style of the psalm which is liturgical, to be used for praise, in praises for the One who has conquered, and thus redeemed the earth for the Lord.
[12].As will be seen later, the Hebrew term dor denotes primarily a life time, or life cycle of an individual.
[13].The Hebrew is in the singular “the one who seeks him”. The translation from the Hebrew of this first part of the verse is the author’s; the latter part is from the NIV.
[14].The Hebrew term dor which is generally translated “generation” does not refer to the progeny, descendants, or followers of the hero. This Hebrew term refers primarily to the life time, or life cycle of the hero. Specifically it was used to describe the span of time between the birth of a male child and the firstborn of that individual.
[15].Genesis 25:26; Genesis 32:27,28.
[16].See also the Messianic prayer of Psalm 22:11: “Be not far from me, for trouble is near and there is none to help”. Psalm 22 is the first of three Messianic psalms, of which Psalm 24 is the last. Psalm 23, at the center of these three is the faith expression of the human Messiah.
[17].Psalm 14:2,3.